Russell M Nelson Political Affiliation

Russell M. Nelson's Political Affiliation: Navigating Faith, Leadership, and Public Discourse

Introduction:

The life and leadership of Russell M. Nelson, the 17th president of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, have captivated global attention. While his religious pronouncements and administrative decisions within the Church are widely reported, his political affiliation remains a subject of curiosity and occasional misinterpretation. This in-depth analysis will explore the complex relationship between faith, leadership, and political engagement, focusing specifically on President Nelson's public stance and actions. We'll delve into his past statements, his Church's official position on political involvement, and the wider implications of his neutrality for both religious and secular audiences. This exploration aims to provide a nuanced understanding, separating fact from speculation, to clarify the often-misunderstood nature of President Nelson’s relationship with politics.


I. President Nelson's Public Statements on Politics: A Case of Deliberate Neutrality

President Nelson, throughout his career as an Apostle and later as President of the Church, has consistently maintained a position of political neutrality. He has avoided endorsing specific candidates or parties, a deliberate strategy reflecting the Church's long-standing policy of remaining separate from partisan politics. This isn't to suggest a lack of concern for social issues; rather, it represents a focused approach to addressing moral and ethical concerns through the lens of religious teachings, without aligning with any specific political ideology. Analyzing his public addresses and interviews reveals a recurring theme: urging members to be informed, responsible citizens while emphasizing the importance of charitable action and community engagement irrespective of political affiliation.


II. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' Official Stance on Political Involvement

The Church's official position on political involvement is rooted in its belief in religious freedom and the separation of Church and state. While members are encouraged to participate actively in civic life, the Church itself does not endorse or oppose political candidates or parties. This policy is deeply ingrained in the Church's history and reflects a commitment to protecting the religious freedom of its diverse membership. The Church focuses on advocating for policies that align with its core values, such as religious freedom, family preservation, and charitable giving. However, this advocacy occurs through lobbying efforts focused on principles rather than partisan alignment. Understanding this official policy is crucial for interpreting President Nelson’s actions and statements.


III. Addressing Common Misconceptions about President Nelson's Political Views

Several misconceptions surround President Nelson's political leanings. Some interpret his pronouncements on moral issues as implicit endorsements of specific political platforms. However, a careful examination reveals that he frames these issues through a religious, rather than a partisan, lens. For instance, his emphasis on family values is rooted in religious doctrine, not a specific political agenda. Furthermore, his calls for unity and understanding transcend political divides, reflecting a broader commitment to building bridges rather than reinforcing political divides. Disentangling his religious teachings from potential political interpretations requires careful consideration of the context of his statements.


IV. The Implications of President Nelson's Neutrality for Religious and Secular Audiences

President Nelson's carefully cultivated political neutrality holds significant implications for both religious and secular audiences. For members of the Church, it underscores the importance of responsible citizenship while upholding the separation of Church and state. It provides a model for navigating the complexities of faith in a pluralistic society. For secular audiences, his approach offers a perspective on religious leadership that prioritizes ethical engagement without partisan entanglements. This neutrality can be seen as a model for fostering respectful dialogue across diverse political viewpoints. Ultimately, his stance promotes a dialogue focused on shared human values rather than divisive political ideologies.


V. Conclusion: A Legacy of Principled Neutrality

In conclusion, President Russell M. Nelson's political affiliation can be best described as a deliberate and consistent neutrality. His public statements, the Church's official position, and the context of his pronouncements all point to a carefully considered approach that prioritizes religious freedom and the separation of Church and state. While he addresses moral and ethical issues pertinent to society, he avoids partisan political endorsements, promoting instead informed citizenship and charitable engagement. This approach sets a powerful example for religious leaders navigating the complexities of the modern world, showcasing a model for navigating the intersection of faith and public life.


Article Outline:

I. Introduction: Hook, overview of the topic, and the structure of the article.
II. President Nelson's Public Statements: Analysis of his public speeches and interviews regarding political matters.
III. The Church's Official Stance: Explanation of the Church's policy on political involvement and its historical context.
IV. Addressing Misconceptions: Debunking common misinterpretations of President Nelson’s views.
V. Implications of Neutrality: Examining the impact of his stance on religious and secular communities.
VI. Conclusion: Summary and concluding thoughts on President Nelson’s political stance.


FAQs:

1. Has President Nelson ever endorsed a political candidate? No, he has consistently maintained political neutrality.
2. Does the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints support any specific political party? No, the Church officially remains neutral on partisan politics.
3. How does President Nelson's neutrality affect his ability to address social issues? He addresses them through a religious framework, focusing on moral principles rather than political platforms.
4. What is the historical reason for the Church's political neutrality? It stems from a desire to protect religious freedom and the separation of Church and state.
5. Does President Nelson encourage members to vote? Yes, he encourages informed and responsible civic participation.
6. How does President Nelson's stance differ from other religious leaders? Many religious leaders may openly endorse specific political candidates or ideologies, whereas President Nelson actively avoids doing so.
7. Could President Nelson's neutrality be interpreted as a lack of engagement with societal issues? No, his engagement is evident through his moral pronouncements, which are not explicitly tied to a specific political party.
8. What are the potential benefits of a religious leader's political neutrality? It can foster unity across political divides and model respectful dialogue.
9. Where can I find more information on the Church's official position on political involvement? The Church's official website and published statements provide detailed information.


Related Articles:

1. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Religious Freedom: Explores the Church’s advocacy for religious liberty worldwide.
2. President Nelson's Teachings on Family Values: Analyzes his statements on the importance of family and its role in society.
3. The Role of Faith in Civic Engagement: Discusses the intersection of religious belief and participation in democratic processes.
4. The Separation of Church and State: A Historical Perspective: Examines the historical development and significance of this principle.
5. Religious Influence on Public Policy: Analyzes the various ways religious beliefs impact policy debates.
6. President Nelson's Leadership Style and its Impact on the Church: Explores the leadership principles adopted by President Nelson.
7. The Church's Humanitarian Efforts: Highlights the extensive charitable work undertaken by the Church globally.
8. Modern Challenges to Religious Freedom: Discusses contemporary threats to religious liberty and the Church's response.
9. Understanding the Doctrine and Covenants: Explains the relevance of this scripture to the Church’s overall approach to social engagement.


  russell m nelson political affiliation: Seeking the Promised Land David E. Campbell, John C. Green, J. Quin Monson, 2014-09-29 Mormons have long had an outsized presence in American culture and politics, but they remain largely unknown to most Americans. Recent years have seen the political prominence of Mormons taken to a new level - including the presidential candidacy of Republican Mitt Romney, the prominent involvement of Mormons in the campaign for California's Proposition 8 (anti-gay marriage), and the ascendancy of Democrat Harry Reid to the position of Senate Majority Leader. This book provides the most thorough examination ever written of Mormons' place in the American political landscape - what Mormons are like politically and how non-Mormons respond to Mormon candidates. However, this is a book about more than Mormons. As a religious subculture in a pluralistic society, Mormons are a case study of how a religious group balances distinctiveness and assimilation - a question faced by all faiths.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Polarization and Political Party Factions in the 2020 Election Jennifer C. Lucas, Tauna S. Sisco, Christopher J. Galdieri, 2022-04-13 This volume explores the conflict between two forces: party polarization and party factionalism. The major change in America’s two political parties over the past half-century has been increased polarization, which has led to a new era of heightened inter-party competition resulting in stronger and more cohesive parties. At the same time, elections, particularly primaries, often reveal deep internal factional divisions within both the parties, and the 2020 election was no different. The Democratic coalition typically pits moderate or establishment candidates against progressive activists and candidates, while the Republican Party in 2020 was, at times, polarized not only between moderates and conservatives but between those willing to criticize President Trump and those who would not. How did these two opposing forces shape the outcome of the 2020 election, and what are the consequences for the future of American party politics and elections?
  russell m nelson political affiliation: The American Political Party System John S. Jackson, 2014-10-14 From party polarization, elections, and internal party politics, to the evolution of the U.S. presidency, John S. Jackson's new book has something for everyone interested in American politics. Beginning with a discussion of the creation of the U.S. government to the formation of today's political powerhouses, Jackson provides a narrative sweep of American party history like none other. Unique to this book is a detailed breakdown of the evolution of political parties from 1832 to the current era. Jackson explains how the reform era came to be, as well as how it produced the polarized party era we have today. In doing so, he guides the reader to an appreciation of where U.S. party politics originated and the aspirations of those who helped create the current system. Jackson also examines the internal mechanisms and personalities of the Democratic and Republican parties. He compares multiple presidential elections, thus telling a broader story of the unfolding of today's party polarization and gridlock. He also explores the theoretical meaning of the changes observed in the parties from the responsible party model perspective. The themes of continuity and change are set in the context of group-think versus rational decisionmaking. Specific focus is given to political elites who are sophisticated about politics and who make strategic decisions, but are also bound by their humanity and occasionally fail to see the right deci-sion due to their own personal biases. This book will be particularly useful for those who want to explore polarization, the responsible parties model, the rational actor model, and anyone who wants to better understand elections, party politics, and the evolution of the presidency.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: The National Black Independent Party Warren N. Holmes, 2016-05-13 This study helps to fill a major void in the literature on African American politics, third parties, and mass movements. Established in 1980, the National Black Political Party (NBIPP) existed for six years and represents the most ambitious attempt by African Americans to establish an independent third-party movement. At its height, NBIPP had chapters throughout the country and had attracted to its membership a young, well-educated, often professional following which had been influenced by the black power movement of the 1960s. This is one of the very few book-length studies of this interesting and important movement. Holmes focuses on a party chapter in Akron, OH, and examines the impact of party building on local mass movement activities an on the political development and continuing political involvement of party members. Utilizing the political process model and issue evolution theory, Holmes explores the linkage between mass movements and normal politics within the African American community. The book makes a very important contribution to our understanding of the current resurgence of black nationalism and how this resurgence fits into a more general pattern of African American politics in which the (sometimes antagonistic) interaction of mass movements and institution building serves to define the African American political agenda a select the elites who will implement it. This book will be useful for students of African American Politics, Sociology of Mass Movements, and Third-Party politics. It will be valuable to the research in those areas, as well as the more general reader who is interested in the African American experience.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Guide to the Presidency Michael Nelson, 2015-05-01 The Guide to the Presidency is an extensive study of the most important office of the U.S. political system. Its two volumes describe the history, workings and people involved in this office from Washington to Clinton. The thirty-seven chapters of the Guide, arranged into seven distinct subject areas (ranging from the origins of the office to the powers of the presidency to selection and removal) cover every aspect of the presidency. Initially dealing with the constitutional evolution of the presidency and its development, the book goes on to expand on the history of the office, how the presidency operates alongside the numerous departments and agents of the federal bureaucracy, and how the selection procedure works in ordinary and special cicumstances. Of special interest to the reader will be the illustrated biographies of every president from Washington to the present day, and the detailed overview of the vice-presidents and first ladies of each particular office. Also included are two special appendices, one of which gathers together important addresses and speeches from the Declaration of Independence to Clinton's Inaugural Address, and another which provides results from elections and polls and statistics from each office.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: From Party Politics to Personalized Politics? Gidʻon Rahaṭ, Ofer Kenig, 2018 This volumes examines two major developments in contemporary democratic politics-- the change in party-society linkage and political personalization--and their relation to each other.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Class Politics and the Radical Right Jens Rydgren, 2013 This volume, which brings together the leading scholars within this field, makes a unique contribution by focusing on the relationship between class politics and the radical right
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Race, Republicans, and the Return of the Party of Lincoln Tasha Philpot, 2009-12-22 Whether their slogan is “compassionate conservatism” or “hawkish liberalism,” political parties have always sought to expand their electoral coalitions by making minor adjustments to their public image. How do voters respond to these, often short-term, campaign appeals? Race, Republicans, and the Return of the Party of Lincoln is Tasha Philpot’s insightful study of how parties use racial images to shape and reshape the way citizens perceive them. “Philpot has produced a timely, provocative, and nuanced analysis of political party image change, using the Republican Party’s attempts to recast itself as a party sensitive to issues of race with its 2000, and later 2004, national conventions as case examples. Using a mixture of experiments, focus groups, national surveys, and analyses of major national and black newspaper articles, Philpot finds that if race-related issues are important to individuals, such as blacks, the ability of the party to change its image without changing its political positions is far more difficult than it is among individuals who do not consider race-related issues important, e.g., whites. This book makes a major contribution to our understanding of party image in general, and political parties’ use of race in particular. Bravo!” —Paula D. McClain, Duke University “This book does an excellent job of illuminating the linkages between racial images and partisan support. By highlighting Republican efforts to ‘play against type’ Philpot emphasizes the limits of successfully altering partisan images. That she accomplishes this in the controversial, yet salient, domain of race is no small feat. In short, by focusing on a topical issue, and by adopting a novel theoretical approach, Philpot is poised to make a significant contribution to the literatures on race and party images.” —Vincent Hutchings, University of Michigan Tasha S. Philpot is Assistant Professor of Government and African and African American Studies at the University of Texas at Austin.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Portrait and Biographical Album of Washtenaw County, Michigan , 1891
  russell m nelson political affiliation: True Blues Adam Hilton, 2021-06-11 Who governs political parties? Recent insurgent campaigns, such as those of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, have thrust this critical question to the center of political debate for casual observers and scholars alike. Yet the dynamics of modern party politics remain poorly understood. Assertions of either elite control or interest group dominance both fail to explain the Trump victory and the surprise of the Sanders insurgency and their subsequent reverberations through the American political landscape. In True Blues, Adam Hilton tackles the question of who governs parties by examining the transformation of the Democratic Party since the late 1960s. Reconceiving parties as contentious institutions, Hilton argues that Democratic Party change was driven by recurrent conflicts between groups and officeholders to define and control party identity, program, and policy. The outcome of this prolonged struggle was a wholly new kind of party—an advocacy party—which institutionalized greater party dependence on outside groups for legitimacy and organizational support, while also, in turn, fostering greater group dependency on the presidency for the satisfaction of its symbolic and substantive demands. Consequently, while the long conflict between party reformers and counter-reformers successfully opened the Democratic Party to new voices and identities, it also facilitated the growth of presidential power, rising inequality, and deepening partisan polarization. Tracing the rise of the advocacy party from the fall of the New Deal order through the presidency of Barack Obama, True Blues explains how and why the Democratic Party has come to its current crossroads and suggests a bold new perspective for comprehending the dynamics driving American party politics more broadly.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Eternal Colonialism Russell Benjamin, Gregory O. Hall, 2010-02-03 This book examines 'eternal colonialism,' which describes policies designed by the Western world and United States to keep most of the world in a permanently subordinate political, economic, social, and military state. The authors argue that colonialism beginning in the fifteenth century never ended, but developed different forms over time.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Guide to U.S. Elections Deborah Kalb, 2015-12-24 The CQ Press Guide to U.S. Elections is a comprehensive, two-volume reference providing information on the U.S. electoral process, in-depth analysis on specific political eras and issues, and everything in between. Thoroughly revised and infused with new data, analysis, and discussion of issues relating to elections through 2014, the Guide will include chapters on: Analysis of the campaigns for presidency, from the primaries through the general election Data on the candidates, winners/losers, and election returns Details on congressional and gubernatorial contests supplemented with vast historical data. Key Features include: Tables, boxes and figures interspersed throughout each chapter Data on campaigns, election methods, and results Complete lists of House and Senate leaders Links to election-related websites A guide to party abbreviations
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Guide to U.S. Political Parties Marjorie R. Hershey, 2014-04-01 This one-volume reference presents the major conceptual approaches to the study of U.S. political parties and the national party system, describing the organization and behavior of U.S. political parties in thematic, narrative chapters that help undergraduate students better understand party origins, historical development, and current operations. Further, it provides researchers with in-depth analysis of important subtopics and connections to other aspects of politics. Key Features: Thematic, narrative chapters, organized into six major parts, provide the context, as well as in-depth analysis of the unique system of party politics in the United States. Top analysts of party politics provide insightful chapters that explore how and why the U.S. parties have changed over time, including major organizational transformations by the parties, behavioral changes among candidates and party activists, and attitudinal changes among their partisans in the electorate. The authors discuss the way the traditional concept of formal party organizations gave way over time to a candidate-centered model, fueled in part by changes in campaign finance, the rise of new communication technologies, and fragmentation of the electorate. This book is an ideal reference for students and researchers who want to develop a deeper understanding of the current challenges faced by citizens of republican government in the United States.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Research Handbook on Political Partisanship Henrik Oscarsson, Sören Holmberg, 2020-05-29 Based on cutting-edge global data, the Research Handbook of Political Partisanship argues that partisanship is down, but not out, in contemporary democracies. Engaging with key scholarly debates, from the rise of right-wing partisanship to the effects of digitalization on partisanship, contributions highlight the significance of political partisanship not only in the present but in the future of democracies internationally.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: The Next Mormons Jana Riess, 2019-02-01 American Millennials--the generation born in the 1980s and 1990s--have been leaving organized religion in unprecedented numbers. For a long time, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was an exception: nearly three-quarters of people who grew up Mormon stayed that way into adulthood. In The Next Mormons, Jana Riess demonstrates that things are starting to change. Drawing on a large-scale national study of four generations of current and former Mormons as well as dozens of in-depth personal interviews, Riess explores the religious beliefs and behaviors of young adult Mormons, finding that while their levels of belief remain strong, their institutional loyalties are less certain than their parents' and grandparents'. For a growing number of Millennials, the tensions between the Church's conservative ideals and their generation's commitment to individualism and pluralism prove too high, causing them to leave the faith-often experiencing deep personal anguish in the process. Those who remain within the fold are attempting to carefully balance the Church's strong emphasis on the traditional family with their generation's more inclusive definition that celebrates same-sex couples and women's equality. Mormon families are changing too. More Mormons are remaining single, parents are having fewer children, and more women are working outside the home than a generation ago. The Next Mormons offers a portrait of a generation navigating between traditional religion and a rapidly changing culture.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: How the Nations Rage Jonathan Leeman, 2018-04-03 How can the church move forward in unity amid such political strife and cultural contention? As Christians, we’ve felt pushed to the outskirts of national public life, yet even within our congregations we are divided about how to respond. Some want to strengthen the evangelical voting bloc. Others focus on social justice causes, and still others would abandon the public square altogether. What do we do when brothers and sisters in Christ sit next to each other in the pews but feel divided and angry? Is there a way forward? In How the Nations Rage, political theology scholar and pastor Jonathan Leeman challenges Christians from across the spectrum to hit the restart button by shifting our focus from redeeming the nation to living as a nation already redeemed rejecting the false allure of building heaven on earth while living faithfully as citizens of a heavenly kingdom letting Jesus’ teaching shape our public engagement as we love our neighbors and seek justice When we identify with Christ more than a political party or social grouping, we can return to the church’s unchanging political task: to become the salt and light Jesus calls us to be and offer the hope of his kingdom to the nations.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Televised Legislatures: Political Information Technology and Public Choice W. Mark Crain, B. Goff, 2012-12-06 Our interest in studying televised legislatures was kindled by two episodes. The first was a series of rejections by the U.S. Senate between 1984 and 1986 of resolutions to permit live television coverage of floor proceedings. The second was the 1984 Camscam affair, the media label given to a partisan war over camera coverage of U.S. House proceedings. Each episode, if nothing else, made plain the intensity of the feelings that elected representatives feel about televised sessions. Legislative television was not taken lightly by those who had the most to gain or lose. Surveys indicate that legislative watchers, C-SP AN junkies, number in the millions and penetration of cable access to televised sessions numbered nearly 40 million in 1986. In addition to the direct viewers, television news programs increasingly use excerpts from the televised sessions as enhancements and sources for political reporting. Televising legislatures, in short, has attracted much new attention to the process oflegislating. The innovation and diffusion of the electronic Acropolis has transformed politics in the U.S. Yet, its impact on the democratic process has attracted little notice except from a few political journalists. Our predilections as economists working in the public choice tradition led us into the analysis of several questions surrounding television: What do televised sessions provide for legislators? How are incumbent reelection bids affected? Do all incumbents benefit? How are legislative sessions changed? Has the enactment of laws been influenced? For the most part, these questions had received only cursory treatment.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Passions and Interests Gerald M. Pomper, 1992 Pomper examines both empirically and normatively, models of party as bureaucratic organization, governing caucus, cause advocate, ideological community, social movement, urban machine, rational office-seeking team, and personal faction. He evaluates the contributions of U.S. political parties to democratic values and presents a program to strengthen the parties as institutions of American democracy.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Party Activists in Southern Politics Charles D. Hadley, Lewis Bowman, 1998 The implications of these and other significant realignments - especially as reflected among grassroots activists in the two major parties - are the focus of this valuable new book.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: The Political Participation of Older People in Europe A. Goerres, 2009-03-26 The first comparative analysis of the political behaviour of older people, using evidence from 20+ European democracies. In contrast to younger people across European societies, older people do not behave uniformly. For political participation in later life, it matters where and when individuals have grown up and in which country they become old.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Beyond the European Left Herbert Kitschelt, Staf Hellemans, 1990 Drawing on recent research on the internal politics of the Belgian ecology parties, Agalev and Ecolo, this work demonstrates how political careers in contemporary social movements lead to activism in left-libertarian politics and influence political ideology. Beyond the European Left is the first comprehensive survey of ecology parties in Europe that presents detailed empirical information on the careers, organizational practices, and political beliefs of the activists involved. The authors employ a new research methodology--surveying party militants--that is better adapted to the study of micropolitics than are expert interviews. Herbert Kitschelt and Staf Hallemans show that European Green party activists express an egalitarian and libertarian vision of a desirable social order that builds on, but radically transforms, ideas of the traditional socialist European left. The authors then examine the debates and disagreements among militants on political objectives and the consequences of conflicting views for party organization and strategy. Their findings illuminate the unique dynamics of left-libertarian politics in a number of Western European countries with obvious relevance to current developments in Eastern Europe.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: The New Politics of the Old South Charles S. Bullock, Mark J. Rozell, 2007 The last presidential election showed without a doubt the prominence of the Southern states in the national political landscape. When it first appeared in 1998, The New Politics of the Old South broke new ground by examining Southern political trends at the end of the twentieth century. Now in its third edition, with all chapters extensively revised and updated to cover events up through the 2004 elections, the authors continue their unique state-by-state analysis of political behavior. Written by the country's leading scholars of Southern politics, and designed to be adopted for courses on Southern politics (but accessible to any interested reader), this book traces the shifting trends of the Southern electorate and explains its growing influence on the course of national politics.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Encyclopedia of World Poverty Mehmet Odekon, 2006 Provides extensive and current information, as well as insight into the contemporary debate on poverty, and contains over 800 original articles written by more than 125 renowned scholars.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Kentucky General Assembly Membership Mike Benassi, 1994
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Parties, Elections and Electoral Contests Marc Guinjoan, 2016-05-13 According to the Duvergerian theories, in the long run, only viable parties are expected to stand for elections. Non-viable parties should join a pre-electoral coalition with another party or withdraw from competition entirely. Why then do non-viable political parties throughout the world systematically continue presenting candidates? This book responds to this evident but unanswered question to create a general theory about deviations from the Duvergerian equilibrium. The author argues that, far from being just a random or irrational decision, the choice of political parties to present candidates when they do not expect to achieve representation can be explained by the overlap of electoral arenas, that generate opportunities for viable parties to present candidates where they are non-viable. In sum, political parties will take advantage of their viability in an arena to present candidacies in other arenas where they do not have chances to become viable. The building of this new theory on electoral contamination allows the construction of a new and more encompassing conceptual framework through which to make sense of what, until now, has been understood as disparate phenomena and contributes to a better understanding of political parties’ strategic behaviour.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: The Wisconsin Blue Book , 1923
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Hearings United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities, 1949
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Hearings Before the Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, Eighty-first Congress, First Session. March 31 and April 1, 1949 Estados Unidos. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities, 1949
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Communist Activities Hearings Before the Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, Eighty-first-Congress, First -second Session S United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities, 1949
  russell m nelson political affiliation: The Long War over Party Structure Byron E. Shafer, Regina L. Wagner, 2019-08-22 Discusses the structure of political parties in order to help understand modern American politics.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Hearings Regarding Communist Infiltration of Radiation Laboratory and Atomic Bomb Project at the University of California, Berkeley, Calif United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities, 1949
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Handbook of Party Politics Richard S Katz, William J Crotty, 2006-01-05 ′This thoughtful and wide-ranging review of parties and party research contains contributions from many of the foremost party scholars and is a must for all library shelves′ - Richard Luther, Keele University ′The study of political parties has never been livelier and this genuinely international Handbook – theoretically rich, comparatively informed, and focused on important questions – defines the field. This volume is both an indispensable summary of what we know and the starting point for future research′ - R K Carty, University of British Columbia ′Political parties are ubiquitous, but their forms and functions vary greatly from regime to regime, from continent to continent, and from era to era. The Handbook of Party Politics captures this variation and richness in impressive ways. The editors have assembled an excellent team, and the scope of the volume is vast and intriguing′ - Kaare Strom, University of California, San Diego Political parties are indispensable to democracy and a central subject of research and study in political science around the world. This major new handbook is the first to comprehensively map the state-of-the-art in contemporary party politics scholarship. The Handbook is designed to: - provide an invaluable survey of the major theories and approaches in this dynamic area of study and research - give students and researchers a concise ′road map′ to the core literatures in all the sub-fields of party related theorizing and research - identify the theories, approaches and topics that define the current ′cutting edge′ of the field. The Handbook is comparative in overall approach but also addresses some topics to be addressed in nationally or regionally specific ways. The resulting collaboration has brought together the world′s leading party theorists to provide an unrivalled resource on the role of parties in the pressing contemporary problems of institutional design and democratic governance today.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: The Rhetoric of the American Political Party Conventions, 1948-2016 Theodore F. Sheckels, 2020-10-13 The Rhetoric of the American Political Party Conventions, 1948-2016 establishes the rhetorical goals of the thirty-six political party conventions that have taken place since 1948 against the backdrop of the fundamental changes that television brought to the conventions. Theodore F. Sheckels analyzes these conventions to determine whether the gatherings met or failed to meet those goals, including addressing civil rights, unifying divergent wings of the party, celebrating the triumph of a single wing, overcoming dissent inside and outside the meeting hall, overcoming—or capitalizing on—scandal, reconstituting the party after defeats, arguing for change, and advocating for inclusion. Sheckels observes that although speeches are the primary vehicle through which attendees strive to reach these goals, the crucial addresses are not always by the principal players; often, events other than speeches such as negotiations, demonstrations, and media spin can be just as consequential. Sheckels discusses both the similarities and differences in the ways in which the conventions do business and constitute and reconstitute what the political parties are, aiming to persuade the public with rhetorical images and messages. Scholars of communication, rhetoric, political science, and American studies will find this book particularly useful.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: U. S. Communist Party Assistance to Foreign Communist Governments United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities, 1963
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Parties in Transition Warren Miller, M. Kent Jennings, 1986-12-07 Every four years, the drama of presidential selection inspires a reassessment of our political parties. Central to this assessment are the delegates who gather at Democratic and Republican national conventions. Parties in Transition presents a richly modulated body of data of the changing attitudes and behaviors of these delegates—their ideologies and loyalties, their recruitment into presidential politics, their persistence in or disengagement from it. Covering three recent sets of conventions and involving over five thousand delegates, this comprehensive study makes an essential contribution to our understanding of American party politics. Richer and more authoritative than most of the best works in the field. —Election Politics A most important study of change in the American political scene....Richly deserves to be read. —John H. Kessel, Ohio State University [A] shrewd and sophisticated analysis....Both scholars and practitioners should read this book and ponder it. —Austin Ranney, University of California, Berkeley
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Presidential Elections Nelson W. Polsby, 2012 Using data and examples from the 2008 election, and laced with previews of 2012, this text offers an overview of the presidential election process from the earliest straw polls and fundraisers to final voter turnout and exit interviews. The coverage includes campaign strategy, the sequence of electoral events, and the issues, all from the perspective of the various actors in the election process voters, interest groups, political parties, the media, and the candidates themselves.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Obama and America’s Political Future Theda Skocpol, 2012-09-04 Barack Obama’s galvanizing victory in 2008, coming amid the greatest economic crisis since the 1930s, opened the door to major reforms. But the president quickly faced skepticism from supporters and fierce opposition from Republicans, who scored sweeping wins in the 2010 midterm election. Here, noted political scientist Theda Skocpol surveys the political landscape and explores its most consequential questions: What happened to Obama’s “new New Deal”? Why have his achievements enraged opponents more than they have satisfied supporters? How has the Tea Party’s ascendance reshaped American politics? Skocpol’s compelling account rises above conventional wisdom and overwrought rhetoric. The Obama administration’s response to the recession produced bold initiatives—health care reform, changes in college loans, financial regulation—that promise security and opportunity. But these reforms are complex and will take years to implement. Potential beneficiaries do not readily understand them, yet the reforms alarm powerful interests and political enemies, creating the volatile mix of confusion and fear from which Tea Party forces erupted. Skocpol dissects the popular and elite components of the Tea Party reaction that has boosted the Republican Party while pushing it far to the right at a critical juncture for U.S. politics and governance. Skocpol’s analysis is accompanied by contributions from two fellow scholars and a former congressman. At this moment of economic uncertainty and extreme polarization, as voters prepare to render another verdict on Obama’s historic presidency, Skocpol and her respondents help us to understand its triumphs and setbacks and see where we might be headed next.
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Remaking the Democratic Party Hanes Walton, Pearl K. Ford, Josephine Allen, 2016-08-09 Examining Southern support for Johnson throughout his political career and his transformative leadership of the Democratic Party
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Index to the Periodicals of 1890-1902 The Review of reviews, 1897
  russell m nelson political affiliation: Congressional Record United States. Congress, 1969 The Congressional Record is the official record of the proceedings and debates of the United States Congress. It is published daily when Congress is in session. The Congressional Record began publication in 1873. Debates for sessions prior to 1873 are recorded in The Debates and Proceedings in the Congress of the United States (1789-1824), the Register of Debates in Congress (1824-1837), and the Congressional Globe (1833-1873)