Advertisement
Jury Instructions Michigan: A Comprehensive Guide for Understanding Your Rights
Understanding the legal process can be daunting, especially when facing a jury trial. In Michigan, jury instructions play a crucial role in determining the outcome of your case. This comprehensive guide will demystify Michigan jury instructions, explaining their purpose, content, and significance for both defendants and plaintiffs. We'll delve into the intricacies of these instructions, providing clarity and empowering you with the knowledge to navigate this critical stage of legal proceedings. Whether you're a defendant, plaintiff, or simply curious about the Michigan legal system, this guide offers invaluable insights.
Understanding the Role of Jury Instructions in Michigan Courts
Jury instructions, also known as jury charges, are formal statements delivered by the judge to the jury before they begin deliberations. These instructions outline the applicable laws relevant to the case, define legal terms, and explain the burden of proof. They are the judge’s way of guiding the jury through the complexities of the law and ensuring they apply the correct legal standards to the facts presented during the trial. In Michigan, the accuracy and clarity of these instructions are paramount to ensuring a fair and just verdict.
The judge carefully selects instructions based on the specific facts and legal issues presented in the case. This process often involves discussions between the judge and the attorneys representing both sides, who may suggest or object to certain instructions. The judge's ultimate decision on which instructions are given is binding on the jury. Failing to properly instruct the jury can lead to appeals and even overturned verdicts.
Key Elements of Michigan Jury Instructions
Michigan jury instructions typically cover several key elements:
1. Definition of Legal Terms: Many legal terms have specific meanings that differ from their everyday usage. The instructions clarify these terms, ensuring the jury understands the legal context in which they are used. For instance, the instruction might define “negligence” in a personal injury case or “reasonable doubt” in a criminal case.
2. Burden of Proof: The instructions clearly state which party bears the burden of proving each element of the case. In civil cases, the plaintiff typically carries the burden of proving their case by a “preponderance of the evidence.” This means the evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims must be more likely true than not. In criminal cases, the prosecution must prove guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt,” a much higher standard.
3. Elements of the Offense (Criminal Cases): In criminal trials, the instructions detail each element of the crime the defendant is accused of committing. The jury must find that the prosecution has proven each element beyond a reasonable doubt to convict the defendant.
4. Applicable Laws: The instructions cite the specific statutes or case law that governs the legal issues in the case. This ensures the jury applies the correct legal principles when evaluating the evidence.
5. Specific Instructions Related to Evidence: The instructions might address specific types of evidence presented during the trial, such as expert testimony, circumstantial evidence, or prior statements. They guide the jury on how to weigh and evaluate such evidence.
6. Verdict Forms: The instructions also include the verdict forms the jury will use to record their decision. These forms specify the different possible verdicts and guide the jury in properly completing the forms.
7. Deliberation Procedures: The judge provides instructions on how the jury should conduct its deliberations, emphasizing the importance of reaching a unanimous verdict (in most cases) and avoiding outside influences.
Challenging Jury Instructions in Michigan
Attorneys have the opportunity to object to proposed jury instructions or request additional instructions. These objections must be made on the record before the instructions are given to the jury. Failure to object can limit the ability to challenge the instructions on appeal. Appeals based on erroneous jury instructions are often successful if the error is deemed prejudicial, meaning it likely affected the jury's verdict.
The Importance of Understanding Jury Instructions
Understanding jury instructions is critical for several reasons:
For Jurors: Accurate understanding ensures a just and fair verdict based on the law.
For Defendants: Understanding the instructions helps the defendant (and their attorney) anticipate potential arguments and strategies.
For Plaintiffs: Understanding ensures the plaintiff can effectively present their case and understand the legal standards needed to prevail.
For Legal Professionals: Knowing the intricacies of Michigan jury instructions is essential for effective case preparation and trial strategy.
Sample Case Scenario and Instruction Application
Imagine a Michigan personal injury case where a plaintiff alleges negligence resulting in a car accident. The jury instructions would likely define negligence (failure to act as a reasonable person would under similar circumstances), outline the elements the plaintiff must prove (duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages), and explain the burden of proof (preponderance of the evidence). The instructions would also guide the jury on how to consider evidence such as witness testimony, police reports, and medical records.
Conclusion
Michigan jury instructions are the cornerstone of a fair trial. Their complexity necessitates careful study and understanding by all involved parties. This guide provides a comprehensive overview to help navigate the complexities of Michigan’s legal processes ensuring a just and equitable outcome. Remember to always consult with a legal professional for advice specific to your situation.
Article Outline: Jury Instructions Michigan
I. Introduction: Hook the reader, briefly explain jury instructions, and outline the article's scope.
II. The Role of Jury Instructions: Detail the purpose and significance of instructions in Michigan courts.
III. Key Elements of Michigan Jury Instructions: Discuss definitions, burden of proof, elements of offenses, and other crucial components.
IV. Challenging Jury Instructions: Explain the process for objecting to instructions and appealing based on errors.
V. Importance of Understanding Jury Instructions: Highlight the benefits for jurors, defendants, plaintiffs, and legal professionals.
VI. Case Scenario and Application: Provide a hypothetical case to illustrate how instructions are applied.
VII. Conclusion: Summarize key points and encourage further research/consultation.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What happens if the jury doesn't understand the instructions? The jury can request clarification from the judge.
2. Can I get a copy of the jury instructions from my case? Yes, typically court records include the jury instructions.
3. Are jury instructions the same in all Michigan courts? While the principles are consistent, specific instructions can vary based on the case facts and applicable law.
4. What if I disagree with the jury instructions? You can object during the trial and potentially appeal if the error is prejudicial.
5. Can I represent myself and understand jury instructions? While you can, it's highly recommended to have legal representation.
6. How long are jury instructions typically? Length varies significantly depending on the complexity of the case.
7. Are jury instructions available online for specific cases? Court records may be available online, but access may be limited.
8. Can I ask the judge to explain a specific part of the instructions? Yes, the jury can ask for clarification.
9. What happens if the jury ignores the jury instructions? This can lead to a mistrial or an appeal.
Related Articles:
1. Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions: A detailed look at instructions specific to criminal cases.
2. Michigan Civil Jury Instructions: Focuses on instructions for civil lawsuits.
3. Understanding Burden of Proof in Michigan: Explains the different standards of proof in various cases.
4. Appealing Jury Instruction Errors in Michigan: Details the process and requirements for appealing.
5. Michigan Court Procedures: Provides an overview of the state's court system.
6. Common Legal Terms in Michigan Courts: Defines frequently used legal terminology.
7. Preparing for Jury Duty in Michigan: A guide for prospective jurors.
8. Your Rights as a Defendant in Michigan: Explains various rights during the legal process.
9. Your Rights as a Plaintiff in Michigan: Explains various rights during the legal process.
| jury instructions michigan: Michigan Criminal Jury Instructions , 1989 |
| jury instructions michigan: Model Civil Jury Instructions for the District Courts of the Third Circuit , 2006 |
| jury instructions michigan: Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions District Judges Association, Sixth Circuit. Committee on Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions, 2008 |
| jury instructions michigan: Michigan Court Rules Kelly Stephen Searl, William C. Searl, 1922 |
| jury instructions michigan: Pattern Jury Instructions , 1997 |
| jury instructions michigan: Michigan Evidence Courtroom Manual Lawrence A. Dubin, A. J. Stephani, Glen Weissenberger, 2021-06-18 Designed specifically for trial use, Michigan Evidence Courtroom Manual's purpose is to provide fast, concise, and authoritative answers to most of the evidentiary questions which arise in the course of trials and hearings, as well as in trial preparation. It accomplishes this through a unique combination of trial-tested features, including: • Rules: The complete rules are collected at the beginning of the book. Individual rules are also at the beginning of the chapter in which the rule is discussed. • Commentary: Perhaps the most important part of this book, the author's Commentary provides a quick overview of the rule under discussion, guidance in interpreting the rule, and helpful pointers for applying the rule in actual practice. In many chapters the Commentary contains special features such as Illustrations, Constitutional Considerations, and Current Trends. • Authority: Following each chapter's Commentary, additional authorities are cited. These give the user a starting point for additional research. • Comparison to Federal Rule: A brief comparison of the Michigan and federal rules in each chapter provides additional insight. • Cases: Recent significant cases are summarized at the end of each chapter. These provide support for argument and decisions required during the course of proceedings. |
| jury instructions michigan: Handbook for federal grand jurors , 2003 |
| jury instructions michigan: Instructions, Verdicts, and Judicial Behavior Robert M. Krivoshey, 2014-01-21 First Published in 1994. Volume 4 in the 4-volume anthology of scholarly articles titled Readings in Trial Advocacy and the Social Sciences; a series seeking to increase our understanding of courtroom dynamics. This fourth volume consists of six jury instructions, six verdicts and two articles on judicial behaviour. These collection raises issues ranging from ability of jurors to understand judicial instructions to the ability of attorneys to predict the outcome of pending litigation. |
| jury instructions michigan: Missouri Approved Jury Instructions (MAI) Stephen H. Ringkamp, Missouri. Supreme Court. Committee on Jury Instructions, Richard E. McLeod, 2002 |
| jury instructions michigan: California Jury Instructions, Civil California. Superior Court (Los Angeles County). Committee on Standard Jury Instructions, Civil, 2002 |
| jury instructions michigan: Pattern Jury Instructions Robert G. Nieland, 1979 A research project of the American Judicature Society. |
| jury instructions michigan: Handbook for trial jurors serving in the United States District Courts , 2003 ... The purpose of this handbook is to acquaint trial jurors with the general nature and importance of their role as jurors; explains some of the language and procedures used in court, and offers some suggestions helpful to jurors in performing their duty ... |
| jury instructions michigan: Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions (IPI), Civil , 2011 |
| jury instructions michigan: Judging the Jury Valerie P. Hans, Neil Vidmar, 2013-11-11 |
| jury instructions michigan: Jury Trial Innovations G. T. Munsterman, 1997 |
| jury instructions michigan: Michigan Nonstandard Jury Instructions Cynthia Diane Stephens, Mary R. Collina, 200? |
| jury instructions michigan: Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts Sanja Kutnjak Ivković, Shari Seidman Diamond, Valerie P. Hans, Nancy S. Marder, 2021-07-29 Offers a comprehensive and comparative picture of how countries around the globe use ordinary citizens to decide criminal cases. |
| jury instructions michigan: Refining Child Pornography Law Carissa Byrne Hessick, 2016-05-10 Legal experts, sociologists, and social workers debate the definition of child pornography, the punishment of offenders, and the protection of victims |
| jury instructions michigan: A Hanging in Detroit David Gardner Chardavoyne, 2003-07-16 The first historical study—and a riveting account—of the last execution in Michigan. On September 24, 1830, Stephen G. Simmons, a fifty-year-old tavern keeper and farmer, was hanged in Detroit for murdering his wife, Levana Simmons, in a drunken, jealous rage. Michigan executed only two people during the fifty-year period, from 1796 to 1846, when the death penalty was legal within its boundaries. Simmons was the second and last person to be executed under Michigan law. In A Hanging in DetroitDavid G. Chardavoyne vividly evokes not only the crime, trial, and execution of Simmons, but also the setting and players of the drama, social and legal customs of the times, and the controversy that arose because of the affair. Chardavoyne illuminates his account of this important moment in Michigan's history with many little-known facts, creating a study that is at once an engrossing story and the first historical examination of the event that helped bring about the abolition of the death penalty in Michigan. Simmons execution came at a time when Michigan had begun to change from a sparsely populated wilderness to a thriving agricultural center, and Detroit from a small military outpost to a metropolis founded on trade, manufacturing, and an influx of immigrants and other settlers. The hanging was a defining moment during this period of dramatic social change. Thousands of spectators crowded into Detroit expecting to see a thrilling public execution. Many of those spectators, however, left deeply disturbed by the spectacle they had witnessed. Chardavoyne, a lawyer, probes the unsettling incident which sparked a profound shift in attitudes toward capital punishment in Michigan, examining along the way such mysteries as why Simmons was hanged for his crime when other contemporary killers were hardly punished at all. A Hanging in Detroit will fascinate legal historians and lay readers alike with its incisive look into Great Lakes regional history and crime and punishment in Michigan. |
| jury instructions michigan: Jury Instructions for Contract Cases Robert E. Kehoe, 1995 |
| jury instructions michigan: Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States National Research Council, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics, Policy and Global Affairs, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law, Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community, 2009-07-29 Scores of talented and dedicated people serve the forensic science community, performing vitally important work. However, they are often constrained by lack of adequate resources, sound policies, and national support. It is clear that change and advancements, both systematic and scientific, are needed in a number of forensic science disciplines to ensure the reliability of work, establish enforceable standards, and promote best practices with consistent application. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward provides a detailed plan for addressing these needs and suggests the creation of a new government entity, the National Institute of Forensic Science, to establish and enforce standards within the forensic science community. The benefits of improving and regulating the forensic science disciplines are clear: assisting law enforcement officials, enhancing homeland security, and reducing the risk of wrongful conviction and exoneration. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States gives a full account of what is needed to advance the forensic science disciplines, including upgrading of systems and organizational structures, better training, widespread adoption of uniform and enforceable best practices, and mandatory certification and accreditation programs. While this book provides an essential call-to-action for congress and policy makers, it also serves as a vital tool for law enforcement agencies, criminal prosecutors and attorneys, and forensic science educators. |
| jury instructions michigan: Mastering The Mechanics Of Civil Jury Trials Tyler G. Draa, Doris Cheng, Maureen Harrington, Franklin E. Bondonno, 2015-10-01 Every case cited in this legacy law eBook is linked to the source and it also contains over 300 links to statutory authorities for all 50 states, making it suitable for a nationwide audience. These invaluable references are available at the touch of your fingertips as you prepare for, or learn about, critical strategies for key civil trial procedures. Mastering the Mechanics of Civil Jury Trials is THE eBook for law students, practicing attorneys, and all who are interested in law. Written by a veritable dream team of civil litigators, one a sitting judge, and all among the top-rated attorneys in the state of California, it’s endorsed by a Who’s Who of star attorneys, Bar associations, and universities due to the full color of real cases versus the black and white limitations of textbook study. Tyler G. Draa et al. are paying it forward with #LegacyLaw. The sequential mechanics of plaintiff or defendant representation is laid out clearly, with practice and planning in mind, gleaned from decades of real practice, including judicial comments throughout, covering: Reconnaissance; Pre-Trial Management; Voir Dire; Motions; Evidence; Cross and Direct Examination; Settlements; Arguments; and every step in between that should be but is not taught in law schools. Numerous legal references apply, enhanced by exhaustively comprehensive state-by-state Appendices listing statutory rulings covering important aspects of trial, including: Peremptory Challenges; Evidentiary Hearings; Jury Instructions; Computer Animation & Other Simulations; Statutes Mirroring CCP 776; and Impeaching Experts With Learned Treatises. In true pay-it-forward fashion, a portion of author proceeds are designated to continuing education organizations and charitable causes. |
| jury instructions michigan: Michigan Court Rules Practice James Arthur Martin, Robert Dean, Robert B. Webster, 1985 |
| jury instructions michigan: The Criminal Justice System Bruce Sales, 2013-03-09 Although psychologists have related, scientifically and professionally, to the law for over 50 years now, the two fields have not been systematically integrated. Happily, that situation is changing today. Psychologists and lawyers are becoming increasingly aware that laws are based upon assumptions about human behavior, assumptions about how people act and how their actions can be controlled (Special Commission on the Social Sciences of the National Science Board, Knowledge into Action: Improving the Nation's Use of the Social Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, 1969, p. 35), and that both fields must be concerned with carefully investigating these assumptions and communicating the findings to the legal community, in particular, and to society, in general. This joining of efforts will ensure that our legal system is not only more effective but also more just. Perspectives in Law and Psychology is a regular series of volumes dedicated to this goal. The work presented in this first volume was supported in part by the National Institute of Mental Health, Center for Studies of Crime and De.1inquency, through their grant (MH 13814) to the Law-Psychology Graduate Training Program at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Funds from that grant were used to invite six of the contributors to this volume to participate in the first Law-Psychology Research Conference (Michael Goldstein, John Monahan, Norval Morris, R. |
| jury instructions michigan: Force of Logic Stephen M. Rice, 2017-05-03 Have you ever read a legal opinion and come across an odd term like the fallacy of denying the antecedent, the fallacy of the undistributed middle, or the fallacy of the illicit process and wondered how you missed that in law school? You’re not alone: every day, lawyers make arguments that fatally trespass the rules of formal logic—without realizing it—because traditional legal education often overlooks imparting the practical wisdom of ancient philosophy as it teaches students how to “think like a lawyer.” In his book, The Force of Logic: Using Formal Logic as a Tool in the Craft of Legal Argument, lawyer and law professor Stephen M. Rice guides you to develop your powers of legal reasoning in a new way, through effective tips and tactics that will forever change the way you argue your cases. Rice contends that formal logic provides tools that help lawyers distinguish good arguments from bad ones and, moreover, that they are simple to learn and use. When you know how to recognize logical fallacies, you will not only strengthen your own arguments, but you will also be able to punch holes in your opponent’s—and that can make the difference between winning and losing. In this book, Rice builds on the theoretical foundation of formal logic by demonstrating logical fallacies through the use of anecdotes, examples, graphical illustrations, and exercises for you to try that are derived from common case documents. It is a hands-on primer that presents a practical approach for understanding and mastering the place of formal logic in the art of legal reasoning. Whether you are a lawyer, a judge, a scholar, or a student, The Force of Logic will inspire you to love legal argument, and appreciate its beauty and complexity in a brand new way. |
| jury instructions michigan: Model Jury Instructions , 2008 This addition to the Model Jury Instructions series, published by the ABA Section of Litigation, provides clear and balanced instructions for presentation to juries in copyright, trademark and trade dress litigation. These models accurately and impartially present the elements and critical definitions of copyright, trademark and trade dress law in language that is understandable and familiar to the average juror. The book includes a CD-ROM of the jury instructions that allows for easy adaptation to particular cases or points. Chapter introductions give overviews of the current state of the law, including the major recent cases in most jurisdictions, with discussions of the practical issues you might have to consider. Individual instructions are followed by commentary that includes discussion of the cases from which the instruction was derived, as well as how and when to adapt the instruction to particular cases, to the laws of particular states, to the requirements of particular jurisdictions, or in the light of inconsistent authority. Besides making it easy to present first-rate instructions, the models and supporting citations give you an excellent starting place from which to investigate the nuances of a particular jurisdiction. This book gives you the framework for preparing and trying your case, from analyzing the fact situation and planning strategy to preparing your final argument.--Publisher's website. |
| jury instructions michigan: Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice, 1986 |
| jury instructions michigan: Homicide Bal K. Jerath, Rajinder Jerath, 2020-08-26 Homicide represents the result of an exhaustive search of the world literature regarding homicide. More than 7,000 entries have been compiled from references selected from major indexes in libraries from outstanding universities, government agencies, and military posts; science libraries; law libraries; and the Library of Congress. Each entry features a one- or two-word annotation that indicates whether it is an article or a book, and all entries conform to the American Psychological Association stylebook guidelines. Key-word and author indexes provide quick access to works pertaining to particular subjects or by a certain author. |
| jury instructions michigan: ABA Journal , 1998-06 The ABA Journal serves the legal profession. Qualified recipients are lawyers and judges, law students, law librarians and associate members of the American Bar Association. |
| jury instructions michigan: Catalog of Copyright Entries. Third Series Library of Congress. Copyright Office, 1972 |
| jury instructions michigan: Psychological Evaluations for the Courts, Fourth Edition Gary B. Melton, John Petrila, Norman G. Poythress, Christopher Slobogin, Randy K. Otto, Douglas Mossman, Lois O. Condie, 2017-12-22 Tens of thousands of readers have relied on this leading text and practitioner reference--now revised and updated--to understand the issues the legal system most commonly asks mental health professionals to address. Highly readable, the volume demystifies the forensic psychological assessment process and provides guidelines for participating effectively and ethically in legal proceedings. Presented are clinical and legal concepts and evidence-based assessment procedures pertaining to criminal and civil competencies, the insanity defense and related doctrines, sentencing, civil commitment, personal injury claims, antidiscrimination laws, child custody, juvenile justice, and other justice-related areas. Case examples, exercises, and a glossary facilitate learning; 19 sample reports illustrate how to conduct and write up thorough, legally admissible evaluations. New to This Edition *Extensively revised to reflect important legal, empirical, and clinical developments. *Increased attention to medical and neuroscientific research. *New protocols relevant to competence, risk assessment, child custody, and mental injury evaluations. *Updates on insanity, sentencing, civil commitment, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Social Security, juvenile and family law, and the admissibility of expert testimony. *Material on immigration law (including a sample report) and international law. *New and revised sample reports. |
| jury instructions michigan: Confirmation Hearings on Federal Appointments United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary, 2013 |
| jury instructions michigan: The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Commission on Life Sciences, Committee on DNA Forensic Science: An Update, 1996-12-12 In 1992 the National Research Council issued DNA Technology in Forensic Science, a book that documented the state of the art in this emerging field. Recently, this volume was brought to worldwide attention in the murder trial of celebrity O. J. Simpson. The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence reports on developments in population genetics and statistics since the original volume was published. The committee comments on statements in the original book that proved controversial or that have been misapplied in the courts. This volume offers recommendations for handling DNA samples, performing calculations, and other aspects of using DNA as a forensic toolâ€modifying some recommendations presented in the 1992 volume. The update addresses two major areas: Determination of DNA profiles. The committee considers how laboratory errors (particularly false matches) can arise, how errors might be reduced, and how to take into account the fact that the error rate can never be reduced to zero. Interpretation of a finding that the DNA profile of a suspect or victim matches the evidence DNA. The committee addresses controversies in population genetics, exploring the problems that arise from the mixture of groups and subgroups in the American population and how this substructure can be accounted for in calculating frequencies. This volume examines statistical issues in interpreting frequencies as probabilities, including adjustments when a suspect is found through a database search. The committee includes a detailed discussion of what its recommendations would mean in the courtroom, with numerous case citations. By resolving several remaining issues in the evaluation of this increasingly important area of forensic evidence, this technical update will be important to forensic scientists and population geneticistsâ€and helpful to attorneys, judges, and others who need to understand DNA and the law. Anyone working in laboratories and in the courts or anyone studying this issue should own this book. |
| jury instructions michigan: Official Reports of the Supreme Court United States. Supreme Court, 1982 |
| jury instructions michigan: United States Reports United States. Supreme Court, 2012 |
| jury instructions michigan: Legal Looseleafs in Print Arlene L. Eis, 1996 |
| jury instructions michigan: Identifying the Culprit National Research Council, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on Law and Justice, Policy and Global Affairs, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law, Committee on Scientific Approaches to Understanding and Maximizing the Validity and Reliability of Eyewitness Identification in Law Enforcement and the Courts, 2015-01-16 Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification makes the case that better data collection and research on eyewitness identification, new law enforcement training protocols, standardized procedures for administering line-ups, and improvements in the handling of eyewitness identification in court can increase the chances that accurate identifications are made. This report explains the science that has emerged during the past 30 years on eyewitness identifications and identifies best practices in eyewitness procedures for the law enforcement community and in the presentation of eyewitness evidence in the courtroom. In order to continue the advancement of eyewitness identification research, the report recommends a focused research agenda. |
| jury instructions michigan: The President's Report to the Board of Regents for the Academic Year ... Financial Statement for the Fiscal Year University of Michigan, 1970 |
| jury instructions michigan: The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Legal Decision-Making Monica K. Miller, Logan A. Yelderman, Matthew T. Huss, Jason A. Cantone, 2024-02-28 Presenting state-of-the-art research, this Handbook summarises emerging and establishing topics in the area of legal decision-making. Interdisciplinary in its approach, it covers decisions made within the criminal justice system, the trial process, and clinical settings. Chapters, written by accomplished academics and experts in the field, synthesize historical context, identify gaps in existing literature, propose future directions of study, and discuss policy limitations. It also includes 'perspectives from the field' essays written by professionals - a judge, an attorney, a police officer, a trial consultant, and a probation officer - to bridge the gap between academic research and its application to the real world. It is intended as a go-to resource for students and researchers who want to immerse themselves in a body of scientific research to understand its history and shape its future. |
| jury instructions michigan: The Limits of Consent Lisa Featherstone, Cassandra Byrnes, Jenny Maturi, Kiara Minto, Renée Mickelburgh, Paige Donaghy, 2023-12-13 This open access book examines the ways that consent operates in contemporary culture, suggesting it is a useful starting point to respectful relationships. This work, however, seeks to delve deeper, into the more complicated aspects of sexual consent. It examines the ways meaningful consent is difficult, if not impossible, in relationships that involve intimate partner violence or family violence. It considers the way vulnerable communities need access to information on consent. It highlights the difficulties of consent and reproductive rights, including the use (and abuse) of contraception and abortion. Finally, it considers the ways that young women are reshaping narratives of sexual assault and consent, as active agents both online and offline. Though this work considers victimisation, it also pays careful attention to the ways vulnerable groups take up their rights and understand and practice consent in meaningful ways. |
